การเปรียบเทียบผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียน วิชา ARC 161 การเขียนแบบทางสถาปัตยกรรม ของนักศึกษาชั้นปีที่ 1 ที่ได้รับการสอนโตยการเรียนแบบร่วมมือโดยเทคนิค STAD กับ การเรียนแบบปกติ

Abstract

The Objective of this research was to address the result of the study which applies STAD technique into the fundamental teaching style for subject ARC 161 (Architectural drawing for the first year students). Quasi- experimental Research has been selected as methodology for this research. The participants consisted of two groups of students in the same class, namely the group which attended the class by using normal teaching style (controlled group) and the group which had been taught by using cooperative learning style (experimental group). Statistical tools including percentage, mean , standard deviation and t-test Independent had been adopted in the research. The two participant groups from the same class had been tested in four different subjects and the results showed as below: 1. The examination on “Orthographic Projection” showed that the learning accomplishment of the participants from ‘experimental group’ had better result (66.90) when compared to the participants in ‘controlled group’ (66.28) 2. The ‘experimental group’ participants had better result for the test of “Axonometric Projection” (72.18) than those from ‘controlled group’ (70.21) 3. The examination on “Two point Perspective” resulted in better marks for ‘experimental group’ (69.50) than those from ‘controlled group’ (62.37)4. The ‘experimental group’ had better results from the examination of “Light & Shadow” (72.18) than those from ‘controlled group’ (65.71) The study on four subjects has statistical significance at 0.05 which is in line with the hypothesis. According to the participants, they perceived that using cooperative style of teaching is useful for them. The result ranked at ‘good’ with an average rate of 4.25. All in all, it was found that adopting cooperative learning into the teaching style by using STAD has resulted in better performance of the students. Majority of the participants agreed and perceived the usefulness of the teaching.