ปวเรศร์ ตันติบุญยานนท์Paowaret Tanitboonyanont2025-08-142025-08-142553-https://dspace.spu.ac.th/handle/123456789/10200The objective of this research was to study the measurement and evaluation for architecture studio instruction by comparative study of design project evaluation between panel jury and independent group Jury. Since all of two methods have been measured and evaluated student works in the instruction of design and architectural design widely. Moreover, the study aimed to emphasize the comparative difference of the statistical significance results. This research relies on statistical methods as a tool to identify differences from both methods through the project in the architectural design 3 studio (ARC213). The results of this study revealed that there were not only inconsistencies in the assessment, but also no significantly statistical difference in both methods. However, there was standard difference of measurement between the instructors of this class. Thus, the researcher proposed that the instructional model using panel jury method has been needed. The students in a studio can be divided into small groups of 10-12, consisting of three instructors for each group, which enable to manage the architectural design studio efficiently.thteachingarchitecturedesign studioevaluationOther