ณัฐวุฒิ อัศวโกวิทวงศ์ชนกพร ไผทสิทธิกุลจรรยา ผลประเสริฐ2025-08-142025-08-142553-https://dspace.spu.ac.th/handle/123456789/10202In architectural studio pedagogy, there have conventionally been two practical student project evaluating systems: the 'Panel' and 'Independent group' jury. The former is a method gathered the evaluation from every instructor in a course; meanwhile the latter per se is within each group. However, both have not been sufficient studied for its significant difference. The researchers aim to statistically identify the degree of differentiation via the student project evaluation in ARC 119 course. It is discovered that the evaluating result of both methods presents in harmonic direction and states no statistic difference. Notwithstanding, the researchers suggest that the panel jury is still necessary for which the gap of marking outputs from various instructors might be fulfilled. Moreover, the harmonic results help clustering to a couple of groups and provide more flexibility to studio and course arrangement.thArchitectural pedagogyProject evaluationDesign studioOther