ชานนท์ วาสิงหนChanon Wasinghon2567-03-192024-03-192557-https://dspace.spu.ac.th/handle/123456789/9650This research aims to develop evaluation techniques to learn and to study the results of the evaluation techniques to learn interior design. That affect student learning interior design course INT415 5 by means of educational evaluation of Bloom (Bloom) and others (1956). The criterion of the learning feature 3 the feel and mood / Attitude (Affective Domain) The Intellectual / Cognitive (Cognitive Domain), and the ability to practice / Skills (Psychomotor Domain). An example is the student population and the fourth field of interior design are enrolled in a course INT415 2nd Semester of 2556 a total of 31 people. The research requires students to design projects and explain the process. Then present the progress with the teacher. The teacher acts measurement and analysis of learning in both quantity and quality of learning efficiency. Development of the knowledge of the students. And effective teaching each group of teachers including a review of teacher and student interviews. Analysis using mean (Mean) and percentage. The study concluded that Students develop better in this class and have a positive attitude towards learning in this course. The skills and knowledge to meet the course objectives clearly. And the results of interviews with teachers who care courses. There is consensus that Management evaluated in such a model. A positive results of teaching with both teachers and learners. Assessment results into empirical over the management of evaluation models. In the opinion of students Most are accepted in the form of appraisal management style. Since there is a clear and develop strengths. Weaknesses in variousthevaluation techniquesknowledgeinterior designOther