กำลังเรียกดู โดย ผู้เขียน "Chitlada Wiwatjarernwong"
ตอนนี้กำลังแสดง1 - 3 ของ 3
ผลลัพธ์ต่อหน้า
ตัวเลือกเรียงลำดับ
รายการ การเปรียบเทียบผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียนของนักศึกษาระหว่างผู้ที่จบการศึกยาระดับประกาศนียบัตรวิชาชีพกับระดับมัธยมศึกษาตอนปลาย ในรายวิชา ACT102 หลักการบัญชีขั้นต้น 2 สาขาวิชาการบัญชี คณะบัญชี มหาวิทยาลัยศรีปทุม(Sripatum University, 2555) จิตรลดา วิวัฒน์เจริญวงศ์; Chitlada WiwatjarernwongThe objective of this research with the single group design was to comparison the learning achievement of students between graduated in the Vocational Certificate Level and High School Education Level in ACT102 Principles of Accounting 2 and studied in the development of learning outcome between two groups. The sample of this research were 111 students of Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting, Sripatum University who were studying in Principles of Accounting 2 course in the second semester of the academic year 2012. The research instruments use were : (1) The lession plan, (2) The Pretest, (3) The Formative test in details of Inventory, Property, Plant and Equipment, Liability and Owners’ equity, and Accounting of Manufacturing Firm. The statistics were frequency, percentage, means, standard deviatiom and the t-test. The results of this research were as follow : 1. The learning achievement of students between graduated in the Vocational Certificate Level and High School Education Level were no significant difference at the 0.05. Furthermore, the finding of this study revealed that the means of learning achievement of students graduated in the Vocational Certificate Level at 2.46 were higher than students graduated in High School Education Level at 2.30. 2. The development of learning achievement scores of students between graduated in the Vocational Certificate Level and High School Education Level were no significant difference at the 0.05. However, the learning achievement scores of both groups were more increased before study in the class.รายการ ผลของการจดั การเรียนรู้แบบใช้คาถามที่มีต่อผลการเรียนรู้ของนักศึกษาในรายวิชา ACT102 หลักการบัญชีขั้นต้น 2(Sripatum University, 2556) จิตรลดา วิวัฒน์เจริญวงศ์; Chitlada WiwatjarernwongThe objective of this quasi-experimantal research with the single group pretestposttest design was to campare learning outcome of students taught by using the effects of questioning method before and after the instruction. The sample of this research were 61 students of Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting, Sripatum University who were studying in Principles of Accounting 2 course in the second semester of the academic year 2013. The research instruments use were : (1) Questioning Method (2) The lession plan, (3) Achievement test. The statistics were frequency, percentage, means, standard deviatiom and the t-test (paired-sample t-test). The results of this research was the method learning by using pretest and posttest on questioning method made the learning outcome scores of the studens were statistically significantly higher than before toward significant increased at the .01 level.รายการ ผลของการใช้เทคนิคการทดสอบย่อยที่มีต่อผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียนของนักศึกษาในรายวิชา ACT314 การบัญชีบริหาร สาขาวิชาการบัญชี คณะบัญชี มหวิทยาลัยศรีปทุม(Sripatum University, 2554) จิตรลดา วิวัฒน์เจริญวงศ์; Chitlada WiwatjarernwongThe objective of this quasi-experimantal research with the single group pretestposttest design was to campare learning achievement of students taught by using the effects of formative tests before and after the instruction. The sample of this research were 64 students of Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting, Sripatum University who were studying in Management Accounting course in the first semester of the academic year 2011. The research instruments use were : (1) The lession plan, (2) The Pretest and Posttest in details of Cost-VolumeProfit Analysis, Decision Making and Relevant Information, Capital Budgeting, and Performance Measurement. The statistics were frequency, percentage, means, standard deviatiom and the t-test. The results of this research were as follow : 1. The method learning by using pretest and posttest and give information feedback made the learning achievement scores of the studens were statistically significantly higher than before toward significant Increased at the .05 level. 2. The development of learning achievement scores of students continuously trend to increase that’s mean students prepare in reading before study in the class.