GRA-04. บทความที่ประชุมวิชาการ (ระดับนานาชาติ)

URI ถาวรสำหรับคอลเล็กชันนี้

https://dspace.spu.ac.th/handle/123456789/2726

เรียกดู

กำลังเรียกดู GRA-04. บทความที่ประชุมวิชาการ (ระดับนานาชาติ) โดย ผู้เขียน "Kanyarat Phakdikumjorn"

ตอนนี้กำลังแสดง1 - 1 ของ 1
  • รูปภาพขนาดย่อ
    รายการ
    Incentives to Affect the Performance of Personnel Under the Governing Body in Kalasin Province
    (2565-01-15) Kanyarat Phakdikumjorn; Natsapan Paopun
    This study aims to be (1.) to study the level of motivation of personnel under the government office in Kalasin Province (2.) to study the operational efficiency of personnel under the administrative office in Kalasin Province (3.) to study the relationship between motivations that affect the performance of personnel under the office. In Kalasin Province, the research population is 400 people affiliated with the government in Kalasin province, the instruments used in the study are questionnaires, the rating scale estimates with a total confidence value of 95%, the statistics used to analyze the data are frequency, percentage, average, standard deviation, and hypothesis test. T-test, F-test and regression analysis, findings showed. The sample, mainly female, between the ages of 36 and 45, undergraduate degree, has a salary rate of more than 15,001 baht, marital status, working at the district administration office and operating period 11-15. Year Incentives affecting the performance of personnel under the administrative office in Kalasin Province. Sorts as follows.1. Achievement in life 2. Responsibility 3. Progression in duty 4. Acceptance from colleagues and supervisors 5. Relationship between colleagues and supervisors 6. Job security 7. Working environment Hypothesis tests showed that personal factors of personnel affiliated with the government office in Kalasin province, including gender, age, education level, salary rate, status. Place of work and duration of operation It is no different, which has a value of Sig greater than 0.05 at a significant level of 0.05 motivation factors. To significant operational efficiency at 0.05 with standardizedcoefficients R=1.00