In architectural studio pedagogy, there have conventionally been two practical
student project evaluating systems: the 'Panel' and 'Independent group' jury. The former is a method
gathered the evaluation from every instructor in a course; meanwhile the latter per se is within each
group. However, both have not been sufficient studied for its significant difference. The researchers
aim to statistically identify the degree of differentiation via the student project evaluation in ARC 119
course. It is discovered that the evaluating result of both methods presents in harmonic direction and
states no statistic difference. Notwithstanding, the researchers suggest that the panel jury is still
necessary for which the gap of marking outputs from various instructors might be fulfilled. Moreover,
the harmonic results help clustering to a couple of groups and provide more flexibility to studio and
course arrangement.